The U. S. Supreme Court recently made a decision that could have a major effect on Philadelphia politics. On Tuesday, the court sided with an unsuccessful Republican candidate for the judiciary in Pennsylvania and overturned a lower court ruling that had allowed the counting of mail-in ballots with minor errors, such as the voter not having entered the date.
This means that the Third Circuit ruling cannot be used as a precedent in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware to permit the counting of ballots with minor mistakes. The annulment of the sentence does not alter the outcome of the electoral race, but it does have implications for future elections. The Third Circuit had ruled that invalidating undated ballots would violate a provision of the historic 1964 federal law called the Civil Rights Act, which was designed to guarantee that minor errors on ballots would not deny anyone the right to vote. Under Pennsylvania law, voters must write the date on the outer envelope of their mail-in ballot. The Third Circuit determined that this requirement is irrelevant to determining a voter's qualifications. In his appeal, the unsuccessful candidate argued that rules for sending ballots by mail improve election administration and deter fraud.
In June, the Supreme Court rejected his request to block the counting of undated ballots. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch disagreed with this decision. Alito wrote that the Third Circuit ruling could well influence the outcome of this year's elections. Voters will go to the polls next November. The unsuccessful candidate testified before the Supreme Court that, unless the Third Circuit ruling was overturned, it would enable the counting of undated mail-in ballots in upcoming Pennsylvania elections and would threaten to invalidate countless regulations on voting by mail across the country. Republican legislators in Pennsylvania echoed his warning. The Supreme Court has a conservative majority of 6 to 3.The Civil Rights Act provision in question prohibits officials from disqualifying a ballot because of an error that is not important in determining whether the person met the requirements to vote, such as their age or citizenship. The law focused on common practices in Southern states during the era of racial segregation, which used small electoral errors to prevent blacks from voting.
In Pennsylvania, there is a closely watched race for the United States Senate between Republican Mehmet Oz and Democrat John Fetterman, which could help determine which party controls that chamber. In May, the Third Circuit issued a ruling as a result of a lawsuit brought by several elderly Democratic and Republican voters who were upset that their votes were not counted because they had not written the date on their mail-in ballot envelope. They described this as a meaningless technicality. In a filing presented to the Supreme Court, Republican legislators in Pennsylvania said that the Third Circuit ruling jeopardized holding orderly elections in November. Several conservative groups active in voting issues also urged judges to overturn this ruling. Third Circuit rulings also apply to other states in America. The strongest argument is based on reliable content, experience from lawyers and publishers, and industry-defining technology. The most comprehensive solution to manage all complex and constantly expanding tax and compliance needs is available through industry leaders in online information for tax, accounting and finance professionals.
Access unparalleled financial data, news, and content in an exceptionally personalized workflow experience on desktop, web, and mobile devices. Explore an unparalleled portfolio of historical and real-time market data and information from sources and experts around the world. Search for higher-risk individuals and entities around the world to help uncover risks hidden in business relationships and human networks.
Leave Message